Peer Review
Our journal uses Peer review (PR) to inspect the quality of a manuscript and to evaluate if it meets the criteria set by us for submission before it is published. In our PR process, editorial team will select independent potential peer reviewers with relevance or specialty in the research area of the manuscripts submitted by author for originality, validity and significance to help editorial team decide whether the manuscript should be published in our journal.
Our journal adopt the double blind type of peer reviewing process where the reviewers cannot have a knowledge of the names of the authors, and the authors also cannot have a knowledge of who the reviewer that handled their manuscript is.
We engaged in Peer review process with manuscripts submitted to our journal due to the fact that it is an integral part of publishing scientifically and that confirms the authenticity of the manuscript. Peer reviewers are professionals and experts who give their time to help in improving the manuscripts they review. After manuscript undergoes the review process, it becomes;
- More comprehensive and robust with loopholes being pointed out by the reviewer for further attention by the author
- More relevant to others in the area of study where the author belongs by considering the importance of the paper
- Less vague and ambiguous, since reviewer could suggest changes where needed